ArticleMachine learning: science and technology2021
A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in radiation therapy.
Article in Machine learning: science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence for machine- and patient-specific quality assurance in radiation therapy: current status and future directions.Journal of radiation research · 2024Review
- Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Review
- Reinforcement learning in medical image analysis: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future directions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Review
- Advances in Automated Treatment Planning.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021Review
- A Review on Application of Deep Learning Algorithms in External Beam Radiotherapy Automated Treatment Planning.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current beam orientation optimization algorithms for radiotherapy, such as column generation (CG), are typically heuristic or greedy in nature because of the size of the combinatorial problem, which leads to suboptimal solutions. We propose a reinforcement learning strategy using Monte Carlo Tree Search that can find a better beam orientation set in less time than CG. We utilize a reinforcement learning structure involving a supervised learning network to guide the Monte Carlo Tree Search and to explore the decision space of beam orientation selection problems. We previously trained a deep neural network (DNN) that takes in the patient anatomy, organ weights, and current beams, then approximates beam fitness values to indicate the next best beam to add. Here, we use this DNN to probabilistically guide the traversal of the branches of the Monte Carlo decision tree to add a new beam to the plan. To assess the feasibility of the algorithm, we used a test set of 13 prostate cancer patients, distinct from the 57 patients originally used to train and validate the DNN, to solve for 5-beam plans. To show the strength of the guided Monte Carlo tree search (GTS) compared to other search methods, we also provided the performances of guided search, uniform tree search and random search algorithms. On average, GTS outperformed all other methods. It found a better solution than CG in 237 seconds on average, compared to 360 seconds for CG, and outperformed all other methods in finding a solution with a lower objective function value in less than 1000 seconds. Using our guided tree search (GTS) method, we could maintain planning target volume (PTV) coverage within 1% error similar to CG, while reducing the organ-at-risk (OAR) mean dose for body, rectum, left and right femoral heads; mean dose to bladder was 1% higher with GTS than with CG.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.