Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967989›Full record

ArticleJournal of nonverbal behavior2022

The Association of Embracing with Daily Mood and General Life Satisfaction: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Julian Packheiser, Imke Marlene Malek, Jacqueline Sophia Reichart, Laura Katona, Maike Luhmann, Sebastian Ocklenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian PackheiserSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9805-6755
Imke Marlene MalekFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Jacqueline Sophia ReichartFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Laura KatonaFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Maike LuhmannFaculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sebastian OcklenburgFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embracing has several positive health effects, such as lowering blood pressure and decreasing infection risk. However, its association with general life satisfaction and daily mood has not been researched in detail. Here, we used a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approach to monitor the daily number of embraces and daily mood in a sample of 94 adults over the course of seven days. We found that embracing frequency differed slightly over the week, with embracing occurring more frequently on weekends than on weekdays. We also found that higher daily embracing frequencies were associated with better daily mood using multilevel modeling. Only singles benefitted from increases in average embracing regarding their life satisfaction, whereas individuals in a relationship were unaffected by their embracing tendencies. Although our results are strictly correlational and do not indicate any direction or causality, embraces may be important for daily mood and general life satisfaction, but their efficacy seems to depend on relationship status. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8.

Indexed as

DepressionEcological momentary assessmentEmbracingLonelinessSocial touch

Identifiers

PMID35967989
PMCPMC9362016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.