ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2022
Embolization using patient-specific vascular models created by a 3D printer for difficult cases: a report of two cases.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-specific vascular models for optimal catheter selection: Two aneurysm embolization cases.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Multimodality imaging and 3D-printing of a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm eroding into the spine.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread use of three-dimensional printers, organ models created by these printers are now being used in the medical field for preoperative planning of surgeries. In this article, we report two cases in which embolization was expected to be difficult, and the three-dimensional printer-based vascular modeling was helpful in planning the surgery. The first case involved an aneurysm of the splenic artery. We attempted to embolize the aneurysm but were unable to advance the catheter into the distal artery and discontinued the procedure. The second case was a perianal varicose vein, which was initially treated with percutaneous transhepatic obliteration but was recanalized and required embolization. However, we expected difficulty in selecting the inferior mesenteric vein. In both cases, the vascular models were created using a 3D printer from the patients' computed tomography images. Preoperative planning, including treatment simulation, was based on these models. The time required to print a three-dimensional vascular model was approximately 12 hours at a cost of less than $10 each. Patient-specific vascular models using a three-dimensional printer can be a simple and inexpensive tool that can increase the success of embolization in difficult cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.