ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2022
Validity of a fall risk assessment score sheet for patients hospitalized in general wards.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Fall Risk and Adverse Events Among General Ward Inpatients at a Regional General Hospital in Japan.Cureus · 2025Article
- History of Falls and Bedriddenness Ranks are Useful Predictive Factors for in-Hospital Falls: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study Using the Saga Fall Risk Model.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls (including fall on same level and fall to a lower level) are frequent medical accidents among hospitalized patients. We investigated the status of falls in our hospital, aiming to verify the usefulness of a fall risk assessment sheet and identify the risk factors of falls. 5219 patients who were admitted to the general wards of our hospital between April 2016 and March 2019 were studied. Patient background data and the result of risk assessment based on a fall risk assessment score sheet at admission were registered. The frequency and location of falls during hospitalization, and the impact on patients were investigated. Risk factors for falls were analyzed based on the assessment results at admission. 218 falls occurred during hospitalization in 152 of 5219 patients (2.9%). The most common location of falls was bedside (68%). Falls occurred at night in 28%. The impact of falls was level 1 in 18 patients, level 2 in 117, level 3a in 11, and level 3b in 6 (all had head injuries, and one had concurrent fracture). Fall rate was 1.1% (41/3791 patients) at risk level I, 6.8% (91/1335 patients) at level II, and 21.5% (20/93 patients) at level III. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age, history of fall, tendency to act without pressing nurse call button, unstable gait, unstable when standing, and use of narcotic as risk factors of falls. The incidence of falls at our hospital was lower compared to previous reports, and fall risk assessment was useful overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.