Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967793›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Home enteral nutrition for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chi Zhang, Li-Wen Hu, Yong Qiang, Zhuang-Zhuang Cong, Chao Zheng, Wen-Feng Gu, Chao Luo, Kai Xie, Yi Shen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Experiences and requirements in nutritional management of patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The application of home enteral nutrition in cancer patients: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Measurement and optimization of perioperative risk among patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chi ZhangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School of Nanjing University, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Li-Wen HuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School of Nanjing University, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yong QiangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhuang-Zhuang CongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School of Nanjing University, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Chao ZhengDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Wen-Feng GuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School of Nanjing University, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Chao LuoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kai XieDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi ShenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School of Nanjing University, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNSoutheast University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Home enteral nutrition (HEN) is a relatively new nutritional intervention that provides patients with EN support at home through jejunostomy or nasogastric feeding tubes. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the safety and effect of HEN compared with normal oral diet (NOD) in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to search articles in English-language journals. The intervention effect was expressed using risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcome measures, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The chi-square test and I-square test were used to test heterogeneity among studies. Results: Four studies were eventually included in this meta-analysis. Compared with NOD, HEN has a favorable impact on postoperative body mass index (BMI) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.09-1.30, Conclusion: HEN improved nutritional status and quality of life (QOL) in postoperative patients with EC and reduced fatigue and the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. All in all, the results of our meta-analysis support the use of HEN after esophagectomy.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagectomyHENhome enteral nutritionnutritional status

Identifiers

PMID35967793
PMCPMC9366554
OpenAlexW4288080905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.