Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967763›Full record

ArticleFutures2022

Is Covid-19 a dread risk? The death toll of the pandemic year 2020 in long-term and transnational perspective.

Bernhard Gill, Theresa Kehler, Michael Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Futures, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernhard GillLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Institut fuer Soziologie, Konradstrasse 6, D-80801 Muenchen, Germany.
Theresa KehlerLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Institut fuer Soziologie, Konradstrasse 6, D-80801 Muenchen, Germany.
Michael SchneiderLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Institut fuer Soziologie, Konradstrasse 6, D-80801 Muenchen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Dread risks" are threats that can have catastrophic consequences. To analyse this issue we use excess mortality and corresponding life years lost as simple measures of the severity of pandemic events. As such, they are more robust than figures from models and testing procedures that usually inform public responses. We analyse data from OECD countries that are already fully available for the whole of 2020. To assess the severity of the pandemic, we compare with historical demographic events since 1880. Results show that reports of high excess mortality during peak periods and local outbreaks should not be taken as representative. Six countries saw a somewhat more increased percentage of life years lost (over 7%), nine countries show mild figures (0-7%), while seven countries had life year gains of up to 7%. So, by historical standards, Covid-19 is worse than regular flu, but a far cry from the Spanish Flu, which has become the predominant frame of reference for the current pandemic. Even though the demographic impact is modest, psychological aspects of the pandemic can still lead to transformative futures, as the reactions of East Asian societies to SARS I in 2003 showed.

Indexed as

Covid-19Dread riskExcess mortalityHuman Mortality DatabaseLife years lostOxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker

Identifiers

PMID35967763
PMCPMC9364948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.