Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967600›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of technology transfer2022

What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda.

Leonid Gokhberg, Dirk Meissner, Ilya Kuzminov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of technology transfer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonid GokhbergNational Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, 20, Moscow, Russian Federation 101000.
Dirk MeissnerNational Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, 20, Moscow, Russian Federation 101000.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-0376
Ilya KuzminovNational Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, 20, Moscow, Russian Federation 101000.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scope, complexity and the "volume" of knowledge accumulated render producing an overview of the core themes of science, technology and innovation policies difficult. Reviews of this policy domain mostly either refer to general issues without deep immersion into details or focus on specific narrower aspects. The paper uses semantic analysis to identify major themes of science, technology and innovation policies over the last three decades and to trace their evolution towards current policy setting. We use semantic tools for processing and analysing documents produced by one of the major and highly reputable international expert bodies, the OECD Working Party on Technology and Innovation Policy. We show that selected themes remain in the mainstream even though being affected by regular policy adjustments and refinements and which disappear or appear with new challenges and expected solutions. Other themes appear niche or exotic themes which are under discussion for some time only.

Indexed as

Big data analysisEvidence based policyInternational policy agendaOECD Working Party on Technology and Innovation PolicyScience policySemantic analysisTechnology and innovation policiesText mining

Identifiers

PMID35967600
PMCPMC9362033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.