Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967500›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

From the drama of unoccupied time and isolation due to Covid-19's pandemic to the need for person-centered care at residential care facilities in Portugal.

Maria Miguel Barbosa, Constança Paúl, Laetitia Teixeira, Javier Yanguas, Rosa Marina Afonso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Miguel BarbosaHealth Sciences Research Centre of the University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI) - Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6201-506 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-4969
Constança PaúlCINTESIS@RISE, ICBAS, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-7805
Laetitia TeixeiraCINTESIS@RISE, ICBAS, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9276-3683
Javier YanguasAubixa Fundazioa, San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-9934
Rosa Marina AfonsoCINTESIS@RISE, ICBAS, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-6873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the pandemic, restrictive measures were implemented at Portuguese residential care facilities (PRCF), such as isolating residents and ceasing collective activities. It is important to understand how PRCF are implementing activities that allow residents to occupy their time and fight isolation. As such, we aim to analyze whether: 1. new activities were implemented for residents (identifying which were carried out); 2. occupation activities were provided to isolated residents in their rooms (identifying which were carried out); 3. the implementation of activities is associated with variables like the amount of staff. This is an exploratory, quantitative, and cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire was sent by email to 2325 PRCF and entities were asked to share it with their workers. The study was also divulged on social networks. Data collection occurred between July 8th and October 18th, 2020. The study had 784 staff members participating and 90.8% reported that new activities were implemented at their facilities, predominantly videocalls. Concerning isolated residents most respondents (64.4%) stated that providing activities was impossible. Results showed that those PRCF that expanded teams had a higher percentage of new activities and activities with residents isolated in bedrooms. These results are alarming because while residents should have had more resources to cope with the pandemic, higher risks of unoccupied time and isolation existed, a dramatic situation for its potentially harmful consequences. Focusing on sanitary issues (and less on older adults) may reinforce traditional care models that had shown negative impacts before the pandemic. This highlights the need to evolve the care paradigm during and beyond the pandemic at PRCF: with Person-Centered Care as an option.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicOccupation activitiesOlder adultsPerson-centered careResidential care facilitiesSocial Isolation

Identifiers

PMID35967500
PMCPMC9361953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.