Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967432›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Notes on syphilis vaccine development.

Noah Kojima, Kelika A Konda, Jeffrey D Klausner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immunodominant extracellular loops ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Comprehensive Overview ofCurrent protein & peptide science · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Longitudinal Variations in theMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noah KojimaDepartment of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Kelika A KondaDepartment of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jeffrey D KlausnerDepartments of Medicine and Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Syphilis Immunology and Biology to Improve Clinical Management and Vaccine DesignR01AI139265 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jeffrey David Klausner · 2018 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quest for a syphilis vaccine to provide protection from infection or disease began not long after the isolation of the first

Indexed as

SyphilisAnimalsBacterial VaccinesImmunizationRabbitsTreponema pallidumVaccine DevelopmentBacterial Vaccinessyphilistreponema pallidumtreponema pallidum antibodiesvaccinevaccines

Identifiers

PMID35967432
PMCPMC9365935
OpenAlexW4288074443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.