Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35967177›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Head and Neck Cancer Stage and Treatment Duration.

Savvas Kourtidis, Julia Münst, Veit M Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prioritization of head and neck cancer patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Savvas KourtidisDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, DEU.
Julia MünstDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, DEU.
Veit M HofmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy of oncologic healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a tertiary university hospital in Germany. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 94 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma during a two-year period. Patients were assigned to two date-dependent groups; referrals before (group A) and during (group B) the COVID-19 pandemic. Time intervals from the symptom(s) onset to diagnosis, diagnosis to treatment, and treatment initiation to completion were recorded. Furthermore, TNM stages and the application of reconstructive surgery with free tissue transfer were determined. Patients' outcomes and characteristics were compared between the two groups. Finally, a comprehensive literature review was carried out to identify similar epidemiological studies. Results The symptom-to-diagnosis interval was longer during the COVID-19 pandemic [median 9.5 (A) versus 15 (B) weeks, p = 0.054]. The intervals from diagnosis to treatment and treatment initiation to end of treatment were approximately the same in both groups [median 3 (A) versus 3.2 (B) weeks, p = 0.264; and 6.9 (A) versus 6.3 (B) weeks, p = 0.136]. The T-and N-stages were not higher during the pandemic [early T-stage (T1+T2) versus advanced T-stage (T3+T4), p = 0.668; and N-negative (N0) versus N-positive status (N1,2,3), p = 0.301]. Patients who presented with distant metastatic disease and those who underwent reconstructive surgery with free tissue transfer were observed more frequently in the lockdown phase [M1 versus M0, p= 0.022; and flap versus no flap, p=0.007]. Conclusion This study suggests the consistent diagnostic and therapeutical performance of the tertiary oncologic healthcare in Berlin, Germany, despite the challenges that patient care units faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

covid-19delayhead and neck cancerpandemicstagingtnm

Identifiers

PMID35967177
PMCPMC9364957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.