ArticleCureus2022
The Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use During Pregnancy and Unfavorable Birth Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effects of electronic cigarettes and dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes on adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Uterine artery transcriptomic signatures of e-cigarette aerosol exposure in pregnancy.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Vaping during pregnancy and maternal, fetal, and infant health outcomes: A scoping review of human and animal studies.PloS one · 2026Article
- The association of parental use of new tobacco products and combustible cigarettes with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Don't go vaping my heart: e-cigarette exposure during pregnancy promotes peripartum ventricular arrhythmias and sympathetic dominance.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objective While the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) continues to gain popularity amongst consumers, literature focusing on the safety and risks of e-cigarette usage remains scarce. Literature focused on the potential effects of e-cigarette use on fetal development is particularly limited. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the use of e-cigarettes during pregnancy and unfavorable birth outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort using secondary data analysis was conducted from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2016-2017 Phase 8 survey. This database contains both state-specific and population-based information on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. Female participants in the study were initially found through each state's birth certificate file. Eligible women included those who have had a recent live birth. Data collection procedures and instruments were standardized to allow comparisons between states. The independent variable was self-reported use of any e-cigarette products during pregnancy. The dependent variable was dichotomized into the presence of at least one unfavorable birth outcome (preterm birth, low birth weight, or extended postnatal hospital stay for the newborn) or the absence of all. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 71,940 women were included in our study. After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, insurance, maternal education, prenatal care, physical abuse during pregnancy, and complications during pregnancy, the odds of unfavorable birth outcomes increase by 62% among women who reported e-cigarette use during pregnancy versus women who did not (aOR 1.62, 95%CI 1.16-2.26, p-value 0.005). Conclusions/implications Moving forward, it is imperative for consumers to understand the implications of using e-cigarettes, such as the increased risk of unfavorable birth outcomes associated with use during pregnancy. Moreover, healthcare providers, particularly obstetricians, should be encouraged to communicate this novel information to at-risk patients. Overall, researchers must continue to study the long-term effects of e-cigarettes, including those on fetal development, as there is still much to be uncovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.