ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2021
Harmonized neonatal brain MR image segmentation model for cross-site datasets.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning techniques for isointense infant brain tissue segmentation: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Multilabel SegSRGAN-A framework for parcellation and morphometry of preterm brain in MRI.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Generative Adversarial Network (Generative Artificial Intelligence) in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of white matter, gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid from neonatal brain MR images is of great importance in characterizing early brain development. Deep-learning-based methods have been successfully applied to neonatal brain MRIs with superior performance if testing subjects were acquired with the same imaging protocols/scanners as training subjects. However, for the testing subjects acquired with different imaging protocols/scanners, they cannot achieve accurate segmentation results due to large appearance/pattern differences between the testing and training subjects. Besides, imaging artifacts, like head motion, which are inevitable during the imaging acquisition process, also pose a challenge for the segmentation methods. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a harmonized neonatal brain MR image segmentation model that harmonizes testing images acquired by different protocols/scanners into the domain of training images through a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN). Meanwhile, the artifacts can be largely alleviated during the harmonization. Then, a densely-connected U-Net based segmentation model trained in the domain of training images can be applied robustly for segmenting the harmonized testing images. Comparisons with existing methods illustrate the better performance of the proposed method on neonatal brain MR images from cross-sites, a grand segmentation challenge, as well as images with artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.