ReviewACS omega2022
Gas Hydrate in Oil-Dominant Systems: A Review.
Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental Investigation on the Gas Phase Behaviour and Inhibition for Hydrates with COMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of temperature, brine, and inhibitor chemistry on emulsion stability in gas condensate systems under pipeline mixing conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Hydrate Formation in Long-Distance Transportation Pipeline for Supercritical-Dense Phase COACS omega · 2024Article
- Methane Hydrate-in-Oil Systems in the Presence of Natural Amino Acid-Equilibrium Phase Condition Measurements.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Kinetic and Thermodynamic Influence of NaCl on Methane Hydrate in an Oil-Dominated System.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Review
- Combined Approach to Evaluate Hydrate Slurry Transport Properties through Wetting and Flow Experiments.ACS omega · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gas hydrate risks minimization in deepsea hydrocarbon flowlines, especially in high water to oil ratios, and is critical for the oil and gas flow assurance industry. Although there are several reviews on gas hydrate mitigation in gas-dominated systems, limited reviews have been dedicated to the understanding and mechanism of hydrate formation and mitigation in oil-dominated systems. Hence, this review article discusses and summarizes the prior studies on the hydrate formation behavior and mitigation in oil-dominated multiphase systems. The factors (such as oil volume or water cut, bubble point, and hydrate formers) that affect hydrate formation in oil systems are also discussed in detail. Furthermore, insight into the hydrate mitigation and mechanism in oil systems is also presented in this review. Also, a detailed table on the various studied hydrate tests in oil systems, including the experimental methods, inhibitor type, conventions, and testing conditions, is provided in this work. The findings presented in this work are relevant for developing the best solution to manage hydrate formation in oil-dominated systems for the oil and gas industry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.