Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966995›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Contrast Sensitivity and Night Driving in Older People: Quantifying the Relationship Between Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, and Hazard Detection Distance in a Night-Time Driving Simulator.

Pete R Jones, Judith Ungewiss, Peter Eichinger, Michael Wörner, David P Crabb, Ulrich Schiefer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in neurology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pete R JonesDepartment of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Judith UngewissCompetence Center "Vision Research", Study Course Ophthalmic Optics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
Peter EichingerStudy Course Mechatronics, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
Michael WörnerCompetence Center "Vision Research", Study Course Ophthalmic Optics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
David P CrabbDepartment of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Ulrich SchieferCompetence Center "Vision Research", Study Course Ophthalmic Optics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
Hochschule Aalen · DECity, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: (i) To assess how well contrast sensitivity (CS) predicts night-time hazard detection distance (a key component of night driving ability), in normally sighted older drivers, relative to a conventional measure of high contrast visual acuity (VA); (ii) To evaluate whether CS can be accurately quantified within a night driving simulator. Materials and Methods: Participants were 15 (five female) ophthalmologically healthy adults, aged 55-81 years. CS was measured in a driving simulator using Landolt Cs, presented under Results: Contrast sensitivity and low contrast VA were both significantly associated with driving performance (both Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity and low contrast VA predict night-time hazard detection ability in a manner that conventional high contrast VA does not. Either may therefore provide a useful metric for assessing fitness to drive at night, particularly in older individuals. CS measurements can be made within a driving simulator, and the data are in good agreement with conventional clinical methods (Optovist I).

Indexed as

agingcontrast sensitivitydrivingdriving simulatorglarenightscotopicvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35966995
PMCPMC9373794
OpenAlexW4288689659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.