ArticlePattern recognition2022
GFNet: Automatic segmentation of COVID-19 lung infection regions using CT images based on boundary features.
Article in Pattern recognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- DeShiftNet: a deformable-shifted cross-attention network for lightweight and robust organoid image segmentation.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CoviSwin: A Deep Vision Transformer for Automatic Segmentation of COVID-19 CT Scans.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- EF-net: Accurate edge segmentation for segmenting COVID-19 lung infections from CT images.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Segmenting and classifying lung diseases with M-Segnet and Hybrid Squeezenet-CNN architecture on CT images.PloS one · 2024Article
- Momentum contrast transformer for COVID-19 diagnosis with knowledge distillation.Pattern recognition · 2023Article
- ERGPNet: lesion segmentation network for COVID-19 chest X-ray images based on embedded residual convolution and global perception.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In early 2020, the global spread of the COVID-19 has presented the world with a serious health crisis. Due to the large number of infected patients, automatic segmentation of lung infections using computed tomography (CT) images has great potential to enhance traditional medical strategies. However, the segmentation of infected regions in CT slices still faces many challenges. Specially, the most core problem is the high variability of infection characteristics and the low contrast between the infected and the normal regions. This problem leads to fuzzy regions in lung CT segmentation. To address this problem, we have designed a novel global feature network(GFNet) for COVID-19 lung infections: VGG16 as backbone, we design a Edge-guidance module(Eg) that fuses the features of each layer. First, features are extracted by reverse attention module and Eg is combined with it. This series of steps enables each layer to fully extract boundary details that are difficult to be noticed by previous models, thus solving the fuzzy problem of infected regions. The multi-layer output features are fused into the final output to finally achieve automatic and accurate segmentation of infected areas. We compared the traditional medical segmentation networks, UNet, UNet++, the latest model Inf-Net, and methods of few shot learning field. Experiments show that our model is superior to the above models in Dice, Sensitivity, Specificity and other evaluation metrics, and our segmentation results are clear and accurate from the visual effect, which proves the effectiveness of GFNet. In addition, we verify the generalization ability of GFNet on another "never seen" dataset, and the results prove that our model still has better generalization ability than the above model. Our code has been shared at https://github.com/zengzhenhuan/GFNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.