Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966966›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology research2018

Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy.

Swathi Eluri, Thomas M Runge, Holly Cirri, Christopher F Martin, Evan S Dellon, Seth D Crockett

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swathi EluriDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
Thomas M RungeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
Holly CirriDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
Christopher F MartinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
Evan S DellonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
Seth D CrockettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, the United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)KL2TR001109 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001109NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimColoWrap is an external abdominal compression device applied during colonoscopy to reduce looping and procedure time. It is unclear if a shorter procedure duration or increased abdominal pressure impacts polyp detection. We determined if use of ColoWrap affected adenoma detection rate (ADR) or detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) compared to sham. MATERIALS AND

methodsAt a single center, participants aged 40-80 were randomized to have ColoWrap or a sham device applied to the lower abdomen. Baseline characteristics, procedural factors, location of polyps, ADR and SSP detection rate (SSPDR) were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess whether ColoWrap was associated with detection of adenomas and SSP.

resultsOf 350 participants, 175 were assigned to each arm. Overall, there were no significant differences in ADR (43%

conclusionUse of ColoWrap during colonoscopy did not negatively impact ADR or SSPDR, and there was an apparent improvement in polyp detection in certain colon locations and patient sub-groups. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.

Indexed as

Adenomatous polypsCancer screeningColonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35966966
PMCPMC9369446
OpenAlexW3034185136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.