Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966941›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2022

Effectiveness of treatment for 31 patients with seropositive autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy in Japan.

Toshiyuki Hayashi, Shunya Nakane, Akihiro Mukaino, Osamu Higuchi, Makoto Yamakawa, Hidenori Matsuo, Kazumi Kimura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy and myasthenia gravis: a case report and review of the literature.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Toshiyuki HayashiDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-1244
Shunya NakaneDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan.
Akihiro MukainoDepartment of Japanese Oriental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Osamu HiguchiDepartment of Clinical Research, NHO Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Makoto YamakawaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hidenori MatsuoDepartment of Neurology, NHO Nagasaki Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazumi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JPKumamoto University · JPNagasaki Kawatana Medical Center · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is characterized by serum autoantibodies against the ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR). Immunomodulatory treatments may alleviate AAG symptoms, but the most appropriate treatment strategy is unclear. Objective: This study aimed to confirm the effectiveness of treatments, particularly immunotherapy, in patients with seropositive AAG in Japan, as well as to determine the most effective treatment and the best assessment method for clinical response to treatment. Methods: We collected data from a previous cohort study of patients with seropositive AAG. The clinical autonomic and extra-autonomic symptoms were objectively counted and subjectively assessed using the modified Composite Autonomic Symptom Score. Post-treatment changes in the gAChR antibody level were evaluated. Results: Thirty-one patients received immunotherapy. Among them, 19 patients received intravenous methylprednisolone; 27, intravenous immunoglobulin; 3, plasma exchange; 18, oral steroids; 2, tacrolimus; 1, cyclosporine; and 1, mycophenolate mofetil. Patients who received immunotherapy showed improvements in the total number of symptoms (from 6.2 ± 2.0 to 5.1 ± 2.0) and modified Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (from 37.4 ± 15.3 to 26.6 ± 12.8). Orthostatic intolerance, sicca, and gastrointestinal symptoms were ameliorated by immunotherapy. Immunotherapy decreased the antibody levels (gAChRα3 antibodies, from 2.2 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.4, Conclusions: The scores in many items on the rating scale decreased after immunotherapy in patients with seropositive AAG, particularly in the combined immunotherapy group. However, more accurate assessment scales for clinical symptoms and multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled prospective studies are warranted to establish future treatment strategies.

Indexed as

autoantibodyautoimmune autonomic ganglionopathyganglionic acetylcholine receptorimmunotherapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID35966941
PMCPMC9364197
OpenAlexW4289551807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.