ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the Impact of Different Doses of ReducoseNutrients · 2024Trial
- Associations ofCurrent developments in nutrition · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional study of associations between theThe American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Observational
- Performance of empirical and model-based classifiers for detecting sucrase-isomaltase inhibition using theJournal of breath research · 2024Article
- A Model-BasedThe Journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Novel gastrointestinal tools (GI Tools) for evaluating gut functional capacity in adults with environmental enteropathy in Zambia and Zimbabwe: A cross-sectional study protocol.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Mechanistic inference of the metabolic rates underlyingJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Environmental enteropathy (EE) is a subclinical disorder highly prevalent in tropical and disadvantaged populations and is thought to play a role in growth faltering in children, poor responses to oral vaccines, and micronutrient deficiencies. This study aims to evaluate the potential of a non-invasive breath test based on stable isotopes for evaluation of impaired digestion and absorption of sucrose in EE. Methods: We optimized a Results: Fully labeled sucrose (0.3 mg/kg) provided clear breath enrichment signals over 2-3 h in both British and Zambian adults, more than fivefold higher than naturally enriched sucrose. Reducose dramatically impaired Conclusion: A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.