Government inaction on COVID-19 vaccines contributes to the persistence of childism in Brazil.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines against omicron in children aged 5 to 11 years.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2023
   Article
2. Spatial clustering of low rates of COVID-19 vaccination among children and adolescents and their relationship with social determinants of health in Brazil: a nationwide population-based ecological study.Public health · 2023
   Article
3. The Brazilian vaccine divide: How some municipalities were left behind in the Covid-19 vaccine coverage.PLOS global public health · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.