Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Chao An, Saijian Ma, Chen Liu, Hao Ding, Wenjiao Xue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biological control ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Isolation and Identification ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. AApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. The seed microbiomes of staple food crops.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Polyyne-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao AnResearch Center for Microbial Metabolites, Shaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Saijian MaResearch Center for Microbial Metabolites, Shaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Chen LiuResearch Center for Microbial Metabolites, Shaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Hao DingResearch Center for Microbial Metabolites, Shaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Wenjiao XueResearch Center for Microbial Metabolites, Shaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Institute of Microbiology · CNMicrobiology Institute of Shaanxi · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) have been considered promising biological agents to increase crop yields for years. However, the successful application of PGPB for biocontrol of sharp eyespot in wheat has been limited, partly by the lack of knowledge of the ecological/environmental factors affecting the colonization, prevalence, and activity of beneficial bacteria on the crop. In this study, an endophytic bacterium XN08 with antagonistic activity against

Indexed as

antifungal activitybiological controlBurkholderia ambifariacolonizationRhizoctonia cerealis

Identifiers

PMID35966702
PMCPMC9368319
OpenAlexW4288096059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.