ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Associations between antimicrobial resistance in fecal
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals in North America.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Antimicrobial use and Escherichia coli resistance patterns in Hungarian pig farms: a data-driven farm-level analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beef Cattle Farmers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward On-Farm Biosecurity, Antimicrobial Use, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Illinois, United States of America.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determinants of Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Factors in the Genome ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Veterinary Feed Directive Rules Changes on the Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance Bacteria Isolated from Cecal Samples of Food-Producing Animals at US Slaughterhouses.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing antimicrobial resistance inEpidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Evaluating Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in CommensalMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance among CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial resistance and its relationship with antimicrobial use on Austrian dairy farms.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in enteric bacteria continues to be detected in turkey flocks and retail products worldwide, including in Canada. However, studies assessing linkages between on-farm antimicrobial use (AMU) and the development of AMR are lacking. This study aims to identify AMU characteristics that impact the development of AMR in the indicator bacteria
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.