Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966662›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Epicuticular wax of sweet sorghum influenced the microbial community and fermentation quality of silage.

Wei Tang, Longxing Liao, Yu Xiao, Jianrong Zhai, Hang Su, Yingjie Chen, Yanjun Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei TangCollege of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Longxing LiaoCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yu XiaoCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jianrong ZhaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Hang SuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yingjie ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yanjun GuoCollege of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Southwest University · CNQingdao Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epicuticular wax, as secondary metabolites (hydrophobic compounds) covering plant surface, plays important roles in protecting plants from abiotic and biotic stresses. However, whether these compounds will influence fermentation process of silage is still not clear. In this study, two sweet sorghum cultivars with varying epicuticular wax on sheath (bloom), Yajin 2 (YJ, less bloom), and Jintian (JT, dense bloom), were harvested at flowering and maturing stages, and ensiled with or without bloom, aiming to evaluate the effects of bloom on fermentation quality, feed nutrition and microbial community. The bloom was collected manually with de-waxed cotton and extracted with chloroform. The results showed that the bloom reduced the concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrate and crude protein of the two cultivars at both stages, reduced lactic acid (LA) for YJ at both stages and for JT at flowering stage, and increased LA for JT at mature stage. The α-diversity of bacterial communities of the silage fermentation with bloom was significantly lower than that without bloom. Bloom increased the abundance of

Indexed as

bloomfermentation qualitymicrobial communitysilagesweet sorghum

Identifiers

PMID35966662
PMCPMC9372506
OpenAlexW4288514082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.