Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Forensic psychiatric analysis of organic personality disorders after craniocerebral injury in Shanghai, China.

Beixu Li, Youxin Fang, Junyi Lin, Xueyan Chen, Chenhu Li, Meng He

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beixu LiSchool of Policing Studies, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.
Youxin FangDepartment of Neurology, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Junyi LinDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xueyan ChenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chenhu LiShanghai Xuhui Mental Health Center, Shanghai, China.
Meng HeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the incidence rate and the differences of clinical manifestations of organic personality disorders with varying degrees of craniocerebral trauma. Materials and methods: According to the International Classification of Diseases-10, 1,027 subjects with craniocerebral trauma caused by traffic accidents were reviewed, the degrees of craniocerebral trauma were graded and those with personality disorder after craniocerebral trauma were diagnosed. The personality characteristics of all patients were evaluated by using the simplified Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Results: The incidence rate of organic personality disorder after all kinds of craniocerebral trauma was 33.1%, while it was 38.7 and 44.2% in the patients after moderate and severe craniocerebral trauma, respectively, which was significantly higher than that in the patients after mild craniocerebral trauma (18.0%) ( Conclusion: The severity and area of craniocerebral trauma is closely related to the incidence rate of organic personality disorder, and it also affects the clinical manifestations of the latter, which provides a certain significance and help for forensic psychiatric appraisal.

Indexed as

clinical manifestationscraniocerebral traumaforensic psychiatryNeuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventorypersonality disorders

Identifiers

PMID35966473
PMCPMC9374033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.