ArticleIEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium2021
Anatomical Feature-Based Lung Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Scoring Scale for Quality Assessment of Lung Ultrasound in the Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound-History, Current and Evolving Clinical Concepts in Emergency Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been used for point-of-care diagnosis of respiratory diseases including COVID-19, with advantages such as low cost, safety, absence of radiation, and portability. The scanning procedure and assessment of LUS are highly operator-dependent, and the appearance of LUS images varies with the probe's position, orientation, and contact force. Karamalis et al. introduced the concept of ultrasound confidence maps based on random walks to assess the ultrasound image quality algorithmically by estimating the per-pixel confidence in the image data. However, these confidence maps do not consider the clinical context of an image, such as anatomical feature visibility and diagnosability. This work proposes a deep convolutional network that detects important anatomical features in an LUS image to quantify its clinical context. This work introduces an Anatomical Feature-based Confidence (AFC) Map, quantifying an LUS image's clinical context based on the visible anatomical features. We developed two U-net models, each segmenting one of the two classes crucial for analyzing an LUS image, namely 1) Bright Features: Pleural and Rib Lines and 2) Dark Features: Rib Shadows. Each model takes the LUS image as input and outputs the segmented regions with confidence values for the corresponding class. The evaluation dataset consists of ultrasound images extracted from videos of two sub-regions of the chest above the anterior axial line from three human subjects. The feature segmentation models achieved an average Dice score of 0.72 on the model's output for the testing data. The average of non-zero confidence values in all the pixels was calculated and compared against the image quality scores. The confidence values were different between different image quality scores. The results demonstrated the relevance of using an AFC Map to quantify the clinical context of an LUS image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.