Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966348›Full record

ArticleSoft computing2022

Adapting recurrent neural networks for classifying public discourse on COVID-19 symptoms in Twitter content.

Samina Amin, Abdullah Alharbi, M Irfan Uddin, Hashem Alyami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samina AminInstitute of Computing, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, 2600 Pakistan.
Abdullah AlharbiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944 Saudi Arabia.
M Irfan UddinInstitute of Computing, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, 2600 Pakistan.
Hashem AlyamiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944 Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 infection, which began in December 2019, has claimed many lives and impacted all aspects of human life. With time, COVID-19 was identified as a pandemic outbreak by the World Health Organization (WHO), putting massive pressure on global health. During this ongoing pandemic, the exponential growth of social media platforms has provided valuable resources for distributing information, as well as a source for self-reported disease symptoms in public discourse. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective approaches to detect self-reported symptoms or cases in social media content. In this study, we scrapped public discourse on COVID-19 symptoms in Twitter content. For this, we developed a huge dataset of COVID-19 self-reported symptoms and gold-annotated the tweets into four categories: confirmed, death, suspected, and recovered. Then, we use a machine and deep machine learning models, each with its own set of features, such as feature representation. Furthermore, the experimentations were achieved with recurrent neural networks (RNNs) variants and compared their performance with traditional machine learning algorithms. Experimental results report that optimizing the area under the curve (AUC) enhances model performance, and the long short-term memory (LSTM) has the highest accuracy in detecting COVID-19 symptoms in real-time public messaging. Thus, the LSTM classifier in the proposed pipeline achieves a classification accuracy of 90.7%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art algorithms for multi-class classification.

Indexed as

ClassificationCoronavirusCOVID-19Deep learningPandemicRecurrent neural networksTwitter

Identifiers

PMID35966348
PMCPMC9364288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.