ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of peripheral-blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio withJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Risk of pulmonary fungal infections associated with biologics: a FAERS database disproportionality analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Risk ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Late-onset cytomegalovirus pneumonia after autologous stem cell transplantation for angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a case report.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 15 NHL patients who developed PCP after rituximab-based chemotherapy during June 30, 2014 to June 1, 2020. We analyzed the laboratory and radiographic findings for those patients through descriptive statistics analysis. Results: The study revealed that PCP in NHL patients was complicated by chemotherapy after about 4 courses (range, 2 to 6 courses). Most patients had a standard lymphocyte count before treatment, and 14 of 15 patients (93.3%) had lymphopenia at the time of diagnosis of PCP. In addition to typical symptoms such as fever and dyspnea at the diagnosis of PCP, most patients had abnormal laboratory indexes such as marked elevations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) both before and at the time of diagnosis. The (1,3)-β-D-glucan test was also revealed as a sensitive index for PCP. Bilateral ground-glass opacity was detected in 14 cases through computed tomography (CT) scans. Positive results of microbiological testing were observed in 7 cases; sputum culture was positive in 3 and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was positive in 3 of these 7 patients, and the other case was positive in both sputum culture and NGS. Patients received high-dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ), caspofungin, and steroids as the treatment for PCP. Ventilatory support was required by 3 patients, so they were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and 1 patient died from PCP. Conclusions: Dynamic monitoring of CRP, LDH, and (1,3)-β-D-glucan test during the treatment of NHL may have a predictive value for the diagnosis of PCP. Additionally, we should use NGS as a rapid and sensitive method for the early diagnosis of PCP. When patients are classified as 'probable PCP', early and effective treatment has obvious significance to improve the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.