Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966256›Full record

ArticleBiochemia medica2022

Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.

Bahar Ünlü Gül, Oğuzhan Özcan, Serdar Doğan, Abdullah Arpaci

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahar Ünlü GülDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Kars Harakani Public Hospital, Kars, Turkey.
Oğuzhan ÖzcanDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
Serdar DoğanDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
Abdullah ArpaciDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autoverification (AV) is a postanalytical tool that uses algorithms to validate test results according to specified criteria. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) document for AV of clinical laboratory test result (AUTO-10A) includes recommendations for laboratories needing guidance on implementation of AV algorithms. The aim was to design and validate the AV algorithm for biochemical tests. Materials and methods: Criteria were defined according to AUTO-10A. Three different approaches for algorithm were used as result limit checks, which are reference range, reference range Results: The AV passing rate was found between 77% and 85%. The highest rates of AV were in alanine transaminase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and magnesium (Mg), which all had AV rates exceeding 85%. The most common reason for non-validated results was the result limit check (41%). A total of 328 reports evaluated by reviewers were compared to AV system. The statistical analysis resulted in a κ value between 0.39 and 0.63 (P < 0.001) and an agreement rate between 79% and 88%. Conclusions: Our improved model can help laboratories design, build, and validate AV systems and be used as starting point for different test groups.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsClinical Laboratory ServicesHumansLaboratoriesLaboratories, ClinicalUniversitiesautomationbiochemistrylaboratory organization and managementvalidation/evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35966256
PMCPMC9344865
OpenAlexW4288682761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.