Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in OCTA Images Based on Multilevel Information Fusion Using a Deep Learning Framework.

Objective: As an extension of optical coherence tomography (OCT), optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) provides information on the blood flow status at the microlevel and is sensitive to changes in the fundus vessels. However, due to the distinct imaging mechanism of OCTA, existing models, which are primarily used for analyzing fundus images, do not work well on OCTA images. Effectively extracting and analyzing the information in OCTA images remains challenging. To this end, a deep learning framework that fuses multilevel information in OCTA images is proposed in this study. The effectiveness of the proposed model was demonstrated in the task of diabetic retinopathy (DR) classification. Method: First, a U-Net-based segmentation model was proposed to label the boundaries of large retinal vessels and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in OCTA images. Then, we designed an isolated concatenated block (ICB) structure to extract and fuse information from the original OCTA images and segmentation results at different fusion levels. Results: The experiments were conducted on 301 OCTA images. Of these images, 244 were labeled by ophthalmologists as normal images, and 57 were labeled as DR images. An accuracy of 93.1% and a mean intersection over union (mIOU) of 77.1% were achieved using the proposed large vessel and FAZ segmentation model. In the ablation experiment with 6-fold validation, the proposed deep learning framework that combines the proposed isolated and concatenated convolution process significantly improved the DR diagnosis accuracy. Moreover, inputting the merged images of the original OCTA images and segmentation results further improved the model performance. Finally, a DR diagnosis accuracy of 88.1% (95%CI ± 3.6%) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 were achieved using our proposed classification model, which significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art classification models. As a comparison, an accuracy of 83.7 (95%CI ± 1.5%) and AUC of 0.76 were obtained using EfficientNet.