Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35966198›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2022

Systematic review of the therapeutic use of Schwann cells in the repair of peripheral nerve injuries: Advancements from animal studies to clinical trials.

Frederic A Vallejo, Anthony Diaz, Emily L Errante, Taylor Smartz, Aisha Khan, Risset Silvera, Adriana E Brooks, Yee-Shuan Lee, Stephen Shelby Burks, Allan D Levi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Schwann cells in regeneration and cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederic A VallejoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Anthony DiazDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
Emily L ErranteDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Taylor SmartzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Aisha KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Risset SilveraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Adriana E BrooksDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Yee-Shuan LeeMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Stephen Shelby BurksDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Allan D LeviDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
University of Miami · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the literature on the therapeutic use of Schwann cells (SC) in the repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: The Cochrane Library and PubMed databases were searched using terms [("peripheral nerve injury" AND "Schwann cell" AND "regeneration") OR ("peripheral nerve injuries")]. Studies published from 2008 to 2022 were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Only studies presenting data from Results: A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases revealed 328 studies. After screening using the abstracts and methods, 17 studies were found to meet our inclusion criteria. Good SC adherence and survival in conduit tubes across various studies was observed. Improvement in morphological and functional outcomes with the use of SCs in long gap peripheral nerve injuries was observed in nearly all studies. Conclusion: Based on contemporary literature, SCs have demonstrated clear potential in the repair of peripheral nerve injury in animal studies. It has yet to be determined which nerve conduit or graft will prove superior for delivery and retention of SCs for nerve regeneration. Recent developments in isolation and culturing techniques will enable further translational utilization of SCs in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

nerve regenerationnerve repairperipheral nerveSchwann cells (SCs)Schwann cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35966198
PMCPMC9372346
OpenAlexW4288423278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.