ArticleBiophysical reports2021
Modification to axial tracking for mobile magnetic microspheres.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-cost acoustic force trap in a microfluidic channel.HardwareX · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional particle tracking is a routine experimental procedure for various biophysical applications including magnetic tweezers. A common method for tracking the axial position of particles involves the analysis of diffraction rings whose pattern depends sensitively on the axial position of the bead relative to the focal plane. To infer the axial position, the observed rings are compared with reference images of a bead at known axial positions. Often the precision or accuracy of these algorithms is measured on immobilized beads over a limited axial range, while many experiments are performed using freely mobile beads. This inconsistency raises the possibility of incorrect estimates of experimental uncertainty. By manipulating magnetic beads in a bidirectional magnetic tweezer setup, we evaluated the error associated with tracking mobile magnetic beads and found that the error of tracking a moving magnetic bead increases by almost an order of magnitude compared to the error of tracking a stationary bead. We found that this additional error can be ameliorated by excluding the center-most region of the diffraction ring pattern from tracking analysis. Evaluation of the limitations of a tracking algorithm is essential for understanding the error associated with a measurement. These findings promise to bring increased resolution to three-dimensional bead tracking of magnetic microspheres.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.