Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965951›Full record

ArticleSN computer science2022

Sentiment Thesaurus, Synset and Word2Vec Based Improvement in Bigram Model for Classifying Product Reviews.

S Poomagal, B Malar, E M Ranganayaki, K Deepika, G Dheepak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S PoomagalPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India.
B MalarPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India.
E M RanganayakiPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India.
K DeepikaPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India.
G DheepakPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classifying product reviews is one of the tasks in Natural Language Processing by which the sentiment of the reviewer towards a product can be identified. This identification is useful for the growth of the business by increasing the number of satisfied customers through product quality improvement. Bigram models are more popular in performing this classification since it considers the occurrence of two words consecutively in the reviews. In the existing works on bigram models, semantically similar words to the words present in bigrams are not considered. As the reviewers use different words with the same meaning to express their feeling, we proposed improved bigram models in which semantically similar words to the words in bigrams are also used for classifying the reviews. In the proposed models, sentiment polarity thesaurus is constructed by including sentiment words and their synonyms. The combinations of constructed thesaurus, Synset and Word2Vec are used for extracting synonyms for the words in the reviews. Performance of the proposed models is compared with the traditional bigram model and state-of-the-art methods. It is observed from the results that our models are able to achieve better performance than traditional model and recent methods.

Indexed as

BigramClassificationNatural Language ProcessingSynsetUnigramWord2Vec

Identifiers

PMID35965951
PMCPMC9362630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.