Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease risk: An evolutionary perspective.

Simon Higgins, Alexander Pomeroy, Lauren C Bates, Craig Paterson, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Herman Pontzer, Lee Stoner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon HigginsDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Alexander PomeroyDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lauren C BatesDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Craig PatersonDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Bethany Barone GibbsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Herman PontzerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lee StonerDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A ubiquitous aspect of contemporary societies is sedentary behavior (SB), defined as low intensity activities in a seated, reclined, or supine posture. Leading public health agencies, including the World Health Organization, have recognized the strong association between SB and poor health outcomes, particularly cardiovascular disease. However, while public health agencies have begun to advocate for "reductions" in SB, the current US guidelines are typically vague and non-specific. There is good reasoning behind this non-committal advocacy-there is limited mechanistic and clinical evidence to support policy development. To guide SB policy development, it is important to first consider the origins and evolution of SB, including the following: 1) is SB really a novel/contemporary behavior? i.e., how has this behavior evolved? 2) how did our ancestors sit and in what contexts? 3) how does SB interact with 24-hour activity behaviors, including physical activity and sleep? 4) what other historical and contemporary facets of life interact with SB? and 5) in what context do these behaviors occur and how might they provide different evolutionarily novel stressors? This perspective article will synthesize the available evidence that addresses these questions and stimulate discussion pertaining to the lessons that we can learn from an historical and evolutionary perspective. Last, it will outline the gaps in current SB interruption literature that are hindering development of feasible SB reduction policy.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseHazdahunter-gathererpublic health policysitting

Identifiers

PMID35965885
PMCPMC9363656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.