ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Biomechanical Analysis of Volleyball Players' Spike Swing Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Biomechanical Analysis of Volleyball Players' Spike Swing Based on Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning is to learn the inherent laws and representation levels of sample data. The information obtained during these learning processes is of great help in the interpretation of data such as text, images, and sounds. Through the deep learning method, the image features are learned independently, and feature extraction is realized, which greatly simplifies the feature extraction process. It uses deep learning technology to capture the motion of volleyball players and realizes the recognition and classification of motion types in the data. It finds the characteristics and deficiencies of the current volleyball players' spiking skills by comparing the test data of 8 volleyball players' spiking skills and biological analysis. The results show that the front and rear spiking balls with double-arm preswing technology have very obvious technical differences. In the take-off stage, there was no significant difference in the buffering time, the kick-off time, and the take-off time in the front and rear row spikes of the A-type. The buffer time of the B-type spike is 0.26 s in the front row and 0.44 s in the rear row. The range of motion of the front row spike is greater than the range of motion of the back row spike. In the air hitting stage, the range of action of the back row spiking is larger than that of the front row spiking, but the range of action of the back row is greater than that of the front row spiking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.