Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965752›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Using Squeeze and Excitation Network with Deep Learning.

Rajendran T, Prajoona Valsalan, Amutharaj J, Jenifer M, Rinesh S, Charlyn Pushpa Latha G, Anitha T

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajendran TMakeit Technologies (Center for Industrial Research), Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-1846
Prajoona ValsalanCollege of Engineering, Dhofar University, Salalah, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-5600
Amutharaj JRajaRajeswari College of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-4741
Jenifer MSchool of Engineering and Technology, Kebri Dehar University, Kebri Dehar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-9682
Rinesh SSchool of Engineering, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-2375
Charlyn Pushpa Latha GSaveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-8487
Anitha TSaveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-1247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the domain of remote sensing, the classification of hyperspectral image (HSI) has become a popular topic. In general, the complicated features of hyperspectral data cause the precise classification difficult for standard machine learning approaches. Deep learning-based HSI classification has lately received a lot of interest in the field of remote sensing and has shown promising results. As opposed to conventional hand-crafted feature-based classification approaches, deep learning can automatically learn complicated features of HSIs with a greater number of hierarchical layers. Because HSI's data structure is complicated, applying deep learning to it is difficult. The primary objective of this research is to propose a deep feature extraction model for HSI classification. Deep networks can extricate features of spatial and spectral from HSI data simultaneously, which is advantageous for increasing the performances of the proposed system. The squeeze and excitation (SE) network is combined with convolutional neural networks (SE-CNN) in this work to increase its performance in extracting features and classifying HSI. The squeeze and excitation block is designed to improve the representation quality of a CNN. Three benchmark datasets are utilized in the experiment to evaluate the proposed model: Pavia Centre, Pavia University, and Salinas. The proposed model's performance is validated by a performance comparison with current deep transfer learning approaches such as VGG-16, Inception-v3, and ResNet-50. In terms of accuracy on each class of datasets and overall accuracy, the proposed SE-CNN model outperforms the compared models. The proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 96.05% for Pavia University, 98.94% for Pavia Centre dataset, and 96.33% for Salinas dataset.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35965752
PMCPMC9371828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.