Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965746›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

DCNN-FuzzyWOA: Artificial Intelligence Solution for Automatic Detection of COVID-19 Using X-Ray Images.

Abbas Saffari, Mohammad Khishe, Mokhtar Mohammadi, Adil Hussein Mohammed, Shima Rashidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abbas SaffariDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Marine Science University, Nowshahr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6679-7225
Mohammad KhisheDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Marine Science University, Nowshahr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-8822
Mokhtar MohammadiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1393-5062
Adil Hussein MohammedDepartment of Communication and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-2051
Shima RashidiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science and Technology, University of Human Development, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-750X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have been considered effective technologies in diagnosing and breaking the transmission chain of COVID-19 disease. Recent research uses the deep convolution neural network (DCNN) as the discoverer or classifier of COVID-19 X-ray images. The most challenging part of neural networks is the subject of their training. Descent-based (GDB) algorithms have long been used to train fullymconnected layer (FCL) at DCNN. Despite the ability of GDBs to run and converge quickly in some applications, their disadvantage is the manual adjustment of many parameters. Therefore, it is not easy to parallelize them with graphics processing units (GPUs). Therefore, in this paper, the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) evolved by a fuzzy system called FuzzyWOA is proposed for DCNN training. With accurate and appropriate tuning of WOA's control parameters, the fuzzy system defines the boundary between the exploration and extraction phases in the search space. It causes the development and upgrade of WOA. To evaluate the performance and capability of the proposed DCNN-FuzzyWOA model, a publicly available database called COVID-Xray-5k is used. DCNN-PSO, DCNN-GA, and LeNet-5 benchmark models are used for fair comparisons. Comparative parameters include accuracy, processing time, standard deviation (STD), curves of ROC and precision-recall, and F1-Score. The results showed that the FuzzyWOA training algorithm with 20 epochs was able to achieve 100% accuracy, at a processing time of 880.44 s with an F1-Score equal to 100%. Structurally, the i-6c-2s-12c-2s model achieved better results than the i-8c-2s-16c-2s model. However, the results of using FuzzyWOA for both models have been very encouraging compared to particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, and LeNet-5 methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19AlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID35965746
PMCPMC9363937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.