Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965675›Full record

ArticleBMJ innovations2021

Strategies for enhancing uptake of HIV self-testing among Nigerian youths: a descriptive analysis of the 4YouthByYouth crowdsourcing contest.

Nora E Rosenberg, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Titilola Gbaja-Biamila, Kadija M Tahlil, Ucheoma Nwaozuru, David Oladele, Adesola Z Musa, Ifeoma Idigbe, Jane Okwuzu, Agatha N David and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ innovations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nora E RosenbergDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehDepartment of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Titilola Gbaja-BiamilaNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Kadija M TahlilDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ucheoma NwaozuruDepartment of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
David OladeleNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Adesola Z MusaNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ifeoma IdigbeNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Jane OkwuzuNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Agatha N DavidNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Tajudeen A BamideleNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Weiming TangDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Oliver EzechiNigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Joseph D TuckerDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Juliet IwelunmorDepartment of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Nigerian Institute of Medical Research · NGSaint Louis University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USGuangzhou University · CN

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
ITEST: Innovative Tools to Expand Youth-Friendly HIV Self-TestingUH3HD096929 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI IWELUNMOR, JULIET · 2020 to 2022
$4.4M
ITEST: Innovative Tools to Expand Youth-Friendly HIV Self-TestingUG3HD096929 · NICHD · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI EZECHI, OLIVER CHUKWUJEKWU, IWELUNMOR, JULIET · 2018 to 2019
$2.3M
Mentoring Multidisciplinary Global HIV Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AI143471 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph David Tucker · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
Developing and Assessing a Male Engagement Intervention for Option B+ in MalawiR00MH104154 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROSENBERG, NORA · 2017 to 2019
$746k
Development of an HIV Self-testing Intervention to Reduce HIV risks among MSM: Taking the Guess Out of SeroguessingR34MH109359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WEI, CHONGYI · 2016 to 2018
$726k
Enhancing Partner Services among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living With HIV: A Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialR34MH119963 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TANG, WEIMING, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2019 to 2021
$568k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143471NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NICHD NIH HHS UG3 HD096929NICHD NIH HHS UH3 HD096929NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104154NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH109359NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH119963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Youth are often the intended beneficiaries of HIV programs but are rarely involved in program design. Engaging youth in program design is one potential way of identifying promising approaches for HIV service delivery. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of using a crowdsourcing contest to solicit ideas on ways to promote HIV self-testing (HIVST) services among Nigerian youths. Methods: From October-November, 2018 Nigerian youth 10-24 years old submitted ideas to a crowdsourcing contest on how to promote HIVST among their peers. Submissions were scored on feasibility, desirability, and impact, with an integer score of 1 (low) to 3 (high) in each domain. The three-domain scores were added to calculate a total score (3-9). The demographic characteristics of contestants were calculated using descriptive statistics. Results: Nine-hundred and three entries were received, 831 had unique valid responses, and 769 were eligible for scoring. Youth submitted ideas on paper (44.9%), Google Forms (39.4%), WhatsApp (9.6%), and email (6.1%). Participants' ages were 10-14 years (37%), 15-19 years (44%), and 20-24 years (22%).Approximately half were female (51.2%). Mean scores were 1.4/3.0 (SD=0.6) for feasibility, 1.4/3.0 (SD=0.6) for desirability, 1.2/3.0 (SD=0.5) for impact, and 4.0/9.0 (SD=1.5) overall. Eight percent of submissions had an overall score >7. A disproportionate share of these high-quality submissions came from email and Google submissions. Conclusion: The 4 Youth by Youth crowdsourcing contest engaged a broad audience and is a feasible way to elicit potential strategies to distribute HIVST kits to other youth. Several high-quality ideas require further evaluation.

Indexed as

crowdsourcingHIVNigeriaself-testingyouth

Identifiers

PMID35965675
PMCPMC9369456
OpenAlexW3133568623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.