ArticleContraception: X2022
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.
Article in Contraception: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Text Message Delivery of a Digital Tool for Reproductive Health Discussions in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Translation Validation, Software Adaptation, and Usability Testing of a Spanish Contraception Decision Tool: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- What's Happening in the Exam Room? A Mixed-Methods Study About the Provision of Patient-Centered Contraceptive Care for Baltimore Latine Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trust, autonomy, and informed consent: a qualitative investigation of youth experiences accessing contraception in Canada.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Access to and quality of contraceptive healthcare for undocumented immigrant women in California.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
- Adolescents' and Young Adults' Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Exploring primary care physician biases in adolescent contraceptive counseling.Contraception · 2025Article
- Integrating Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Into Public Health Goals and Metrics: Comparative Analysis of Healthy People 2030's Approach and a Person-Centered Approach to Contraceptive Access Using Population-Based Data.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Intersection of Nativity and English Proficiency With Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.O&G open · 2024Article
- Tools for patient-centred family planning counselling: A scoping review.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Article
- Provider perspectives on a point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care among Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients' ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics. Study design: Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients' reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of "excellent" versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients' characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care. Results: The majority of women (59%-69%) reported that their family planning provider was "excellent" across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported "excellent" on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings. Conclusions: In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients' preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities. Implications: Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.