Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965637›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Autonomous Scanning Target Localization for Robotic Lung Ultrasound Imaging.

Xihan Ma, Ziming Zhang, Haichong K Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xihan MaDepartment of Robotics Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609 USA.
Ziming ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609 USA.
Haichong K ZhangDepartment of Robotics Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 01609 USA.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Robotic Lung Ultrasound for Triage of COVID-19 Patients in a Resource-Limited EnvironmentDP5OD028162 · OD · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI ZHANG, HAICHONG · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NIH HHS DP5 OD028162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the ceaseless global COVID-19 pandemic, lung ultrasound (LUS) is the emerging way for effective diagnosis and severeness evaluation of respiratory diseases. However, close physical contact is unavoidable in conventional clinical ultrasound, increasing the infection risk for health-care workers. Hence, a scanning approach involving minimal physical contact between an operator and a patient is vital to maximize the safety of clinical ultrasound procedures. A robotic ultrasound platform can satisfy this need by remotely manipulating the ultrasound probe with a robotic arm. This paper proposes a robotic LUS system that incorporates the automatic identification and execution of the ultrasound probe placement pose without manual input. An RGB-D camera is utilized to recognize the scanning targets on the patient through a learning-based human pose estimation algorithm and solve for the landing pose to attach the probe vertically to the tissue surface; A position/force controller is designed to handle intraoperative probe pose adjustment for maintaining the contact force. We evaluated the scanning area localization accuracy, motion execution accuracy, and ultrasound image acquisition capability using an upper torso mannequin and a realistic lung ultrasound phantom with healthy and COVID-19-infected lung anatomy. Results demonstrated the overall scanning target localization accuracy of 19.67 ± 4.92 mm and the probe landing pose estimation accuracy of 6.92 ± 2.75 mm in translation, 10.35 ± 2.97 deg in rotation. The contact force-controlled robotic scanning allowed the successful ultrasound image collection, capturing pathological landmarks.

Identifiers

PMID35965637
PMCPMC9373068
OpenAlexW4200470402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.