Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A real-world study of anlotinib as third-line or above therapy in patients with her-2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

Yingbo Shao, Zhifen Luo, Yang Yu, Yaning He, Chaojun Liu, Qi Chen, Fangyuan Zhu, Bing Nie, Hui Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yingbo ShaoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhifen LuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yang YuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yaning HeDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Chaojun LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qi ChenDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Fangyuan ZhuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Bing NieDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Provincial People's Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CNZhengzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antiangiogenic agents provides an optional treatment strategy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third-line or above therapy for patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer who have failed from prior therapy and treated with anlotinib monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy from June 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 47 patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy as third-line or above therapy. In the general population, 10 patients achieved PR, 25 patients had SD and 12 patients had PD. The overall ORR and DCR were 21.3% and 74.5%, respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that there were no statistically significant differences in ORR and DCR with respect to HR status (positive vs. negative), treatment programs (monotherapy vs. combination) and treatment type in combination group (chemotherapy vs. immunotherapy). The patients who did not received previously anti-angiogenesis therapy had superior DCR (84.8% vs. 50.0%, P=0.012). Median PFS and OS were 5.0 months (95% CI=4.3-5.7) and 21.0 (95% CI=14.9-27.1) months, respectively. The PFS (6.5m vs. 3.5m, P=0.042)and OS (28.2m vs. 12.6m, P=0.040) were better in HR positive patients than HR negative patients. And simultaneously, patients who received anlotinib combination therapy obtained better PFS (5.5m vs. 3.0m, P=0.045). The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events(AEs) was 31.9%. Conclusions: Anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy provide a viable third-line or above therapeutic strategy in patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer, a median PFS of 5.0 months was obtained with well tolerated toxicity.

Indexed as

anlotinibanti-angiogenesisbreast cancerimmunotherapysafety

Identifiers

PMID35965587
PMCPMC9366600
OpenAlexW4288080662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.