Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35965387›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Effects of a mildly cooked human-grade dog diet on gene expression, skin and coat health measures, and fecal microbiota of healthy adult dogs.

Elizabeth L Geary, Patrícia M Oba, Catherine C Applegate, Lindsay V Clark, Christopher J Fields, Kelly S Swanson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth L GearyDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Patrícia M ObaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-1791
Catherine C ApplegateDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Lindsay V ClarkHigh Performance Computing in Biology, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Christopher J FieldsHigh Performance Computing in Biology, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Kelly S SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-3076
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purported benefits of human-grade pet foods include reduced inflammation, enhanced coat quality, and improved gut health, but research is scarce. Therefore, we compared gene expression, skin and coat health measures, and the fecal microbiome of dogs consuming a mildly cooked human-grade or extruded kibble diet. Twenty beagles (BW = 10.25 ± 0.82 kg; age = 3.85 ± 1.84 yr) were used in a completely randomized design. Test diets included: 1) chicken and brown rice recipe [feed-grade; extruded; blue buffalo (BB)]; and 2) chicken and white rice [human-grade; mildly cooked; Just Food for Dogs (JFFD)]. The study consisted of a 4-week baseline when all dogs ate BB, and a 12-week treatment phase when dogs were randomized to either diet (n = 10/group). After the baseline and treatment phases, fresh fecal samples were scored and collected for pH, dry matter (DM), and microbiome analysis; blood samples were collected for gene expression analysis; hair samples were microscopically imaged; and skin was analyzed for delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), sebum concentration, hydration status, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Data were analyzed as a change from baseline (CFB) using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS (version 9.4). At baseline, fecal pH was higher (P < 0.05) and hair surface score, superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression was lower (P < 0.05) in dogs allotted to JFFD. The decrease in CFB fecal pH and DM was greater (P < 0.05) in dogs fed JFFD, but fecal scores were not different. The increase in CFB hair surface score was higher (P < 0.05) in dogs fed JFFD. The decrease in CFB TEWL (back region) was greater (P < 0.05) in dogs fed JFFD, but TEWL (inguinal and ear regions), hydration status, and sebum concentrations in all regions were not different. Hair cortex scores and DTH responses were not affected by diet. The increase in CFB gene expression of SOD, COX-2, and TNF-α was greater (P < 0.05) in dogs fed JFFD. PCoA plots based on Bray-Curtis distances of bacterial genera and species showed small shifts over time in dogs fed BB, but dramatic shifts in those fed JFFD. JFFD increased (adj. P < 0.05) relative abundances of 4 bacterial genera, 11 bacterial species, 68 KEGG pathways, and 167 MetaCyc pathways, and decreased (adj. P < 0.05) 16 genera, 25 species, 98 KEGG pathways, and 87 MetaCyc pathways. In conclusion, the JFFD diet dramatically shifted the fecal microbiome but had minor effects on skin and coat measures and gene expression.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDigestionDogsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaCyclooxygenase 2DietFecesGene ExpressionSuperoxide DismutaseTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaWaterCyclooxygenase 2Superoxide DismutaseTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaWatercanine nutritionfecal microbiomeskin and coat health

Identifiers

PMID35965387
PMCPMC9527297
OpenAlexW4291383375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.