ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2022
Epipericardial Fat Necrosis: A Retrospective Analysis in Japan.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epipericardial Fat Necrosis in COVID-19-A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Epipericardial fat necrosis: a rare case of chest pain and key learning points.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Mediastinal fat necrosis-an overlooked cause of chest pain.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024Article
- Ectopic epipericardial fat necrosis: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- EPIPERICARDIAL FAT NECROSIS.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Epipericardial fat necrosis (EFN) has been considered to be a rare cause of acute chest pain, and especially important for emergency physicians. Chest computed tomography (CT) is often used for the diagnosis of EFN after excluding life-threatening states, such as acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism. While the proportion of EFN patients who underwent chest CT in emergency departments is being clarified, little is still known about other departments in Japan. To investigate the proportion of EFN patients who underwent chest CT for acute chest pain in various departments. Methods Chest CT performed from January 2015 to July 2020 in Asahikawa Medical University Hospital in Japan was retrospectively analyzed in this study. All images were reviewed by two radiologists. Results There were 373 outpatients identified by a search using the word 'chest pain' who underwent chest CT. Eight patients satisfying the imaging criteria were diagnosed with EFN. The proportions of patients diagnosed with EFN were 10.7%, 4.8%, 2.8%, 0.9% and 0% in the departments of general medicine, cardiovascular surgery, emergency medicine, cardiovascular internal medicine and respiratory medicine, respectively. Only 12.5% of the patients were correctly diagnosed with EFN, and the other patients were treated for musculoskeletal symptoms, acute pericarditis or hypochondriasis. Conclusion EFN is not rare and is often overlooked in various departments. All physicians as well as emergency physicians should consider the possibility of EFN as the cause of pleuritic chest pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.