Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35964327›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Implementation of a Work-Related Asthma Screening Questionnaire in Clinical Settings: Multimethods Study.

Madison MacKinnon, Max Moloney, Emma Bullock, Alison Morra, Teresa To, Catherine Lemiere, M Diane Lougheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison MacKinnonAsthma Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-0249
Max MoloneyAsthma Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-910X
Emma BullockAsthma Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0453-8433
Alison MorraAsthma Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4904-9978
Teresa ToThe Hospital for Sick Children, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-3423
Catherine LemiereDepartment of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-9628
M Diane LougheedAsthma Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-8759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA work-related asthma (WRA) screening questionnaire is currently being validated for implementation in clinical settings. To minimize barriers to integrating tools into clinical practice, a discussion of strategies for the implementation of the questionnaire has begun.

objectiveThis study aimed to understand the benefits, feasibility, barriers, and limitations of implementing the Work-related Asthma Screening Questionnaire-Long version (WRASQ[L]) and asthma e-tools in clinical settings and propose dissemination and implementation strategies for the WRASQ(L).

methodsThis study was conducted in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, from September 2019 to August 2021. A workshop and 2 questionnaires were used to understand the benefits of and barriers to implementing the questionnaire in clinical settings. An expert advisory committee was established to develop the implementation and dissemination strategies. Workshops were semistructured and used thematic qualitative analysis to identify themes that provided an understanding of the benefits and limitations of and barriers to using the WRASQ(L), and e-tools in general, in clinical settings. Workshop participants included patients and health care providers, including physicians, nurses, and asthma educators, who were implementation specialists and expert electronic medical record users. A questionnaire focusing on providers' knowledge and awareness of WRA and another focusing on WRASQ(L) feedback was administered at the workshops. Advisory committee members from relevant stakeholders met 3 times to strategize implementation opportunities.

resultsA total of 6 themes were identified in the workshop: involving and addressing patient needs, novel data collection, knowledge translation, time considerations, functional and practical barriers, and human limitations. Questionnaire responses yielded positive feedback on the utility of the WRASQ(L) in clinical settings. All participants agreed that it is an easy way of collecting information on occupational and exposure history and could prompt a discussion between the health care provider and patient on how the workplace and exposures could affect one's asthma, increase awareness of WRA in patients and providers, and increase awareness of exposures in the workplace. Implementation and dissemination strategies were generated with input from the advisory committee.

conclusionsStakeholders and workshop participants consider the WRASQ(L) to be a useful tool that satisfies many provider needs in their clinical settings. Once validated, dissemination strategies will include developing educational materials that include the WRASQ(L), linking the questionnaire to stakeholder websites or e-toolkits, translation into other languages, leveraging health care and research networks, conference presentations, and peer-reviewed publications. Implementation strategies will include integration into electronic medical records; designing multifaceted interventions; and targeting nontraditional settings such as workplaces, pharmacies, and research settings. The WRASQ(L) addresses many benefits of and barriers to implementation, as identified in the workshop themes. These themes will guide future implementation and dissemination strategies, noting that human limitations identified in providers and patients will need to be overcome for successful implementation.

Indexed as

asthmabarriersdisseminationelectronic medical recordsEMRse-toolsimplementationknowledge translationlimitationsmobile phonework-related asthma

Identifiers

PMID35964327
PMCPMC9523520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.