ArticleSystematic reviews2022
The development and education of a workforce in childhood cancer services in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment-related mortality in children with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Characterizing patients who benefit from mature medical AI models in real-world clinical applications.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Patient pathways, presentation time, time to diagnosis, and early survival outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- The magnitude and associated factors of childhood cancer treatment abandonment at the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Parental Reports on Late Effects and Follow-Up Needs: A Single-Center Assessment of Childhood Cancer Survivorship Care in Kenya.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Unlocking delays: revealing barriers to early diagnosis of childhood central nervous system tumors in an upper-middle-income country.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- A Multidisciplinary Consensus-Building Exercise to Define and Prioritize Topics in Supportive Care of Children With Cancer at a Global Level.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Impact of Project ECHO in Children With Cancer in Western Kenya: A Case Series.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for parents of children with cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Paediatric oncology in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR): the current state and challenges.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Review
- Developing a partnership to improve health care delivery to children <18 years with cancer and blood disorders in the English-speaking Caribbean: lessons from the SickKids-Caribbean Initiative (SCI).Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Review
- Article
- Validation of an automated contouring and treatment planning tool for pediatric craniospinal radiation therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn estimated 400,000 children develop cancer worldwide. Of those, 90% occur in low- and middle-income countries, where survival rates can be as low as 30%. To reduce the childhood cancer survival gap between high- and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the World Health Organization launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer in 2018, to support governments in building sustainable childhood cancer programs, with the aim to increase access and quality of care for children with cancer. Developing a high-quality and trained workforce is key to the success of childhood cancer services, but more information is needed on the interventions used to develop and train a workforce. The objective of this review is to understand the key factors described in the literature in relation to the development and training of a workforce in childhood cancer (defined here as ages 0-19) in LMIC, including challenges, interventions and their outcomes.
methodsWe will include sources of evidence that describe the development or training of a childhood cancer workforce in health services that diagnose, refer or treat children and adolescents with cancer, in low- and middle-income countries as defined by the World Bank. The following databases will be searched: OVID Medline, Embase and Pubmed from 2001 to present with no restriction of language. Grey literature searches will also be performed in Proquest Dissertation and Theses, as well as relevant organizations' websites, and conference proceedings will be searched in conference websites. In addition, references lists will be reviewed manually. Two people will screen abstracts and full-texts and extract data. Data will be presented in a table or chart, with an accompanying narrative summary responding to the review questions. A framework synthesis will be conducted: data will be charted against a framework adapted from the 2016 WHO Global Strategy for Human Resources for Heath: Workforce 2030. DISCUSSION: This scoping review will allow to map the existing literature on workforce development in LMIC, identify potential interventions and highlight data and knowledge gaps. This constitutes a first step towards adopting successful strategies more broadly, formulating research priorities and developing effective policies and interventions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework osf.io/3mp7n.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.