Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35964046›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Improving access to public physical activity events for disadvantaged communities in Australia.

Janette L Smith, Lindsey J Reece, Catriona L Rose, Katherine B Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. "We WantQualitative health research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janette L SmithPrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Level 6, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Lindsey J ReecePrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Level 6, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Catriona L RosePrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Level 6, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Katherine B OwenPrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Level 6, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. katherine.owen@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity has numerous health benefits, but participation is lower in disadvantaged communities. 'parkrun' overcomes one of the main barriers for disadvantaged communities, the cost of activities, by providing a free, regular community-based physical activity event for walkers, runners and volunteers. This study assesses equity of access (in terms of distance to the nearest parkrun) stratified by socioeconomic deprivation, and identifies the optimal location for 100 new events to increase equity of access.

methodsWe combined information about population location and socioeconomic deprivation, with information about the location of 403 existing parkrun events, to assess the current level of access by deprivation quintile. We then used a two-step location-allocation analysis (minimising the sum of deprivation-weighted distances) to identify optimal regions, then optimal towns within those regions, as the ideal locations for 100 new parkrun events.

resultsCurrently, 63.1% of the Australian population lives within 5 km of an event, and the average distance to an event is 14.5 km. A socioeconomic gradient exists, with the most deprived communities having the largest average distance to an event (27.0 km), and the least deprived communities having the best access (living an average 6.6 km from an event). Access improves considerably after the introduction of new event locations with around 68% of the population residing within 5 km of an event, and the average distance to the nearest event approximately 8 km. Most importantly, the improvement in access will be greatest for the most deprived communities (now an average 11 km from an event).

conclusionsThere is a socioeconomic gradient in access to parkrun events. Strategic selection of new parkrun locations will improve equity of access to community physical activity events, and could contribute to enabling greater participation in physical activity by disadvantaged communities.

Indexed as

ExerciseVulnerable PopulationsAustraliaHumansGeospatial analysisHealth inequalitiesHealth promotionParkrunPhysical activitySocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID35964046
PMCPMC9375319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.