Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35964045›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Study protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled multi-center trial evaluating the additional effect of continuous ultrasound bladder monitoring in urotherapy for children with functional daytime urinary incontinence (SENS-U trial).

L L de Wall, A J Nieuwhof-Leppink, E H M van de Wetering, E Leijn, M Trompetter, L M O de Kort, W F Feitz, R Schappin

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L L de Wall *Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. liesbeth.dewall@radboudumc.nl.
A J Nieuwhof-Leppink *Department of Medical Psychology and Social Work, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E H M van de WeteringDepartment of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
E LeijnTOP voor Kinderen Practice, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M TrompetterDepartment of Urology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
L M O de KortDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W F FeitzDepartment of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
R SchappinDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 852002105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower urinary tract dysfunction or functional urinary incontinence is a common condition with a prevalence up to 21% between 6 and 8 year-old children. It is associated with an impaired quality of life, lower self-esteem, and social stigmatization. Urotherapy is the first treatment of choice for functional daytime urinary incontinence (DUI) in children. Alarm therapy can be a part of urotherapy as it provides the child adequate feedback on wetting accidents. Current alarm systems notify either at a set interval or give a notification when wetting has already occurred to prompt the child to go to the toilet. These alarms do not teach the child the interpretation of the bladder sensation preceding wetting accidents. A new wearable bladder sensor, the SENS-U, recently became available. This is a relative small, wireless ultrasonic sensor, which continuously monitors bladder filling. The SENS-U is able to provide an alarm at the exact moment voiding is warranted. It facilitates the child to learn the sensation of bladder filling preceding voiding in an easier way, increasing the learning curve throughout treatment. Its additional effect in urotherapy on continence and cost-effectiveness is to be determined. METHODS/

designThis is a multi-center clinical superiority parallel-group randomized controlled trial including a total of 480 children. Participants between 6 and 16 years of age with functional DUI in which urotherapy is offered as the next treatment of choice are eligible. Four centers, two academic hospitals, and two general care (peripheral) centers are participating. Participants will be randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups: urotherapy (care as usual), urotherapy with the SENS-U added for 3 consecutive weeks throughout the training, or urotherapy with a SHAM device for 3 weeks. The primary outcome is number of wetting accidents per week after 3 months of training, compared between the SENS-U and the SHAM device. The magnitude of the placebo effect will be assessed by comparing the results of the SHAM group versus the control (care as usual) group. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first trial studying not only the effect but also the cost-effectiveness of alarm interventions as commonly added in urotherapy.

trial registrationISRCTN44345202 . Registered on March 2022.

Indexed as

Diurnal EnuresisUrinary IncontinenceAdolescentChildEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary BladderAlarm interventionsBladder trainingChildrenUrotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35964045
PMCPMC9375366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.