Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35964005›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

A composite strategy of genome-wide association study and copy number variation analysis for carcass traits in a Duroc pig population.

Rongrong Ding, Zhanwei Zhuang, Yibin Qiu, Xingwang Wang, Jie Wu, Shenping Zhou, Donglin Ruan, Cineng Xu, Linjun Hong, Ting Gu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Association ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rongrong Ding *College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Zhanwei Zhuang *College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Yibin Qiu *College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Xingwang WangCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Jie WuCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Shenping ZhouCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Donglin RuanCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Cineng XuCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Linjun HongCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Ting GuCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Enqin ZhengCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Gengyuan CaiCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China.
Wen HuangDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Zhenfang WuCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China. wzfemail@163.com.
Jie YangCollege of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510642, P.R. China. jieyang2012@hotmail.com.
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNMichigan State University · USWen's Food Group (China) · CN

Funding

Guangdong Province Rural Revitalization Strategy Special Project 200-2018-XMZC-0001-107-0145Guangdong Yang Fan Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program 2016YT03H062Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Province 2019BT02N630National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarcass traits are important in pig breeding programs for improving pork production. Understanding the genetic variants underlies complex phenotypes can help explain trait variation in pigs. In this study, we integrated a weighted single-step genome-wide association study (wssGWAS) and copy number variation (CNV) analyses to map genetic variations and genes associated with loin muscle area (LMA), loin muscle depth (LMD) and lean meat percentage (LMP) in Duroc pigs.

resultsFirstly, we performed a genome-wide analysis for CNV detection using GeneSeek Porcine SNP50 Bead chip data of 3770 pigs. A total of 11,100 CNVs were detected, which were aggregated by overlapping 695 CNV regions (CNVRs). Next, we investigated CNVs of pigs from the same population by whole-genome resequencing. A genome-wide analysis of 21 pigs revealed 23,856 CNVRs that were further divided into three categories (851 gain, 22,279 loss, and 726 mixed), which covered 190.8 Mb (~ 8.42%) of the pig autosomal genome. Further, the identified CNVRs were used to determine an overall validation rate of 68.5% for the CNV detection accuracy of chip data. CNVR association analyses identified one CNVR associated with LMA, one with LMD and eight with LMP after applying stringent Bonferroni correction. The wssGWAS identified eight, six and five regions explaining more than 1% of the additive genetic variance for LMA, LMD and LMP, respectively. The CNVR analyses and wssGWAS identified five common regions, of which three regions were associated with LMA and two with LMP. Four genes (DOK7, ARAP1, ELMO2 and SLC13A3) were highlighted as promising candidates according to their function.

conclusionsWe determined an overall validation rate for the CNV detection accuracy of low-density chip data and constructed a genomic CNV map for Duroc pigs using resequencing, thereby proving a value genetic variation resource for pig genome research. Furthermore, our study utilized a composite genetic strategy for complex traits in pigs, which will contribute to the study for elucidating the genetic architecture that may be influenced and regulated by multiple forms of variations.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwineCarcass traitsCopy number variationGWASPigs

Identifiers

PMID35964005
PMCPMC9375371
OpenAlexW4291201992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.