Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963980›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Kinesiophobia, Knee Self-Efficacy, and Fear Avoidance Beliefs in People with ACL Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Garrett S Bullock, Timothy C Sell, Ryan Zarega, Charles Reiter, Victoria King, Hailey Wrona, Nilani Mills, Charlotte Ganderton, Steven Duhig, Anu Räisäsen and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the health literacy status of people with hearing impairment: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rehabilitation Interventions for Fear-Avoidance Beliefs and Behaviors in Sudden Onset Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Scoping Review.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Characterization of Tiered Psychological Distress Phenotypes in an Orthopaedic Sports Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Garrett S BullockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA. garrettbullock@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0236-9015
Timothy C SellAtrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Ryan ZaregaAtrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Charles Reiter
Victoria KingAtrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Hailey WronaAtrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Nilani MillsAtrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Charlotte GandertonSwinborne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Steven DuhigGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Australia.
Anu RäisäsenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, OR, USA.
Leila LedbetterMedical Libraries, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Gary S CollinsCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joanna KvistUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Medicine, Linkoping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Stephanie R FilbayCentre of Health, Exercise, and Sport Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Atrium Medical Cente · USArthritis UK · GBDuke Medical Center · USGriffith University · AULinköping University · SENuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Calgary · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve the understanding of the psychological impacts of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, a systematic review synthesizing the evidence on knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury is needed.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to investigate knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury, and compare these outcomes following management with rehabilitation alone, early and delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsSeven databases were searched from inception to April 14, 2022. Articles were included if they assessed Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (KSES), or Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using domain-based RoB tools (ROBINS-1, RoB 2, RoBANS), and GRADE-assessed certainty of evidence. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled outcomes, stratified by time post-injury (pre-operative, 3-6 months, 7-12 months, > 1-2 years, > 2-5 years, > 5 years).

resultsSeventy-three studies (70% high RoB) were included (study outcomes: TSK: 55; KSES: 22; FABQ: 5). Meta-analysis demonstrated worse kinesiophobia and self-efficacy pre-operatively (pooled mean [95% CI], TSK-11: 23.8 [22.2-25.3]; KSES: 5.0 [4.4-5.5]) compared with 3-6 months following ACLR (TSK-11: 19.6 [18.7-20.6]; KSES: 19.6 [18.6-20.6]). Meta-analysis suggests similar kinesiophobia > 3-6 months following early ACLR (19.8 [4.9]) versus delayed ACLR (17.2 [5.0]). Only one study assessed outcomes comparing ACLR with rehabilitation only.

conclusionsKnee self-efficacy and kinesiophobia improved from pre-ACLR to 3-6 months following ACLR, with similar outcomes after 6 months. Since the overall evidence was weak, there is a need for high-quality observational and intervention studies focusing on psychological outcomes following ACL injury.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFearHumansKnee JointSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35963980
OpenAlexW4291250420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.