Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963957›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2023

Impact of sex on outcomes after surgery for non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Keiichiro Mori, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Satoshi Katayama, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Benjamin Pradere, Hadi Mostafaei, Fahad Quhal, Pawel Rajwa, Marco Moschini, Francesco Soria and 11 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology and screening for urologic cancers.World journal of urology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-6569
Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Satoshi KatayamaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hadi MostafaeiDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fahad QuhalDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marco MoschiniDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SoriaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
David D'andreaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simone AlbisinniDepartment of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wataru FukuokayaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shin EgawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jeremy Yc TeohDepartment of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
European Association of Urology–Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group (EAU-YAU)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the prognostic value of sex for non-muscle-invasive/muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (NMIBC/MIBC) treated with radical surgery.

methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they involved the comparison of the overall, cancer-specific, progression, and recurrence-free survival of patients with NMIBC/MIBC. Formal sex-stratified meta-analyses of these outcomes were performed.

resultsThirty-one studies, which included 32,525 patients with NMIBC, and 63 studies, which included 85,132 patients with MIBC, were eligible for review and meta-analysis. Female sex was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.31) and overall survival (pooled HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) in patients with MIBC. In contrast, however, sex was not associated with cancer-specific survival (pooled HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.46), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.24), and recurrence-free survival (pooled HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.16) in patients with NMIBC.

conclusionsSex is associated with an increased risk of worse survival outcomes in patients with MIBC but not in those with NMIBC. Given the genetic and social differences between sexes, sex may represent a key factor in the clinical decision-making process.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsUrinary BladderMeta-analysisMuscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinomaNon-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinomaSex

Identifiers

PMID35963957
PMCPMC10159976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.