Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963844›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Vaccine effectiveness of CoronaVac against COVID-19 among children in Brazil during the Omicron period.

Pilar T V Florentino, Flávia J O Alves, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Vinicius de Araújo Oliveira, Juracy B S Júnior, Adelson G Jantsch, Gerson O Penna, Viviane Boaventura, Guilherme L Werneck, Laura C Rodrigues and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Pilar T V FlorentinoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil. pilar.veras@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-8100
Flávia J O AlvesCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-2270
Thiago Cerqueira-SilvaGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4534-2509
Vinicius de Araújo OliveiraCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7858-9650
Juracy B S JúniorPublic Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Adelson G JantschGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.
Gerson O PennaTropical Medicine Centre, University of Brasília, Fiocruz School of Government, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-536X
Viviane BoaventuraGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.
Guilherme L WerneckDepartment of Epidemiology, Social Medicine Institute, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1169-1436
Laura C RodriguesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Neil PearceLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Manoel Barral-NettoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-7903
Mauricio L BarretoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Salvador, Brazil.
Enny S PaixãoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-908X
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 213589/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although severe COVID-19 in children is rare, they may develop multisystem inflammatory syndrome, long-COVID and downstream effects of COVID-19, including social isolation and disruption of education. Data on the effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine is scarce during the Omicron period. In Brazil, children between 6 to 11 years are eligible to receive the CoronaVac vaccine. We conducted a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness using 197,958 tests from January 21, 2022, to April 15, 2022, during the Omicron dominant period in Brazil among children aged 6 to 11 years. The estimated vaccine effectiveness for symptomatic infection was 39.8% (95% CI 33.7-45.4) at ≥14 days post-second dose. For hospital admission vaccine effectiveness was 59.2% (95% CI 11.3-84.5) at ≥14 days. Two doses of CoronaVac in children during the Omicron period showed low levels of protection against symptomatic infection, and modest levels against severe illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19BrazilCase-Control StudiesChildHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeVaccine Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35963844
PMCPMC9375192
OpenAlexW4291214620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.