Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35963586›Full record

ArticleAppetite2022

The impact of caloric availability on eating behavior and ultra-processed food reward.

Amber L Kelly, Mary Elizabeth Baugh, Mary E Oster, Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of ultra-processed food in obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Food Addiction.Brain sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Determinants of obesity in Latin America.Nature metabolism · 2024 · on this map
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. From dearth to excess: the rise of obesity in an ultra-processed food system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amber L KellyFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, USA.
Mary Elizabeth BaughFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, USA.
Mary E OsterFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, USA.
Alexandra G DiFeliceantonioFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, USA; Center for Health Behaviors Research; Department of Human Nutrition Foods and Exercise at Virginia Tech, USA. Electronic address: dife@vtc.vt.edu.

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The food environment has changed rapidly and dramatically in the last 50 years. While industrial food processing has increased the safety and stability of the food supply, a rapid expansion in the scope and scale of food processing in the 1980's has resulted in a market dominated by ultra-processed foods. Here, we use the NOVA definition of category 4 ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as they make up around 58% of total calories consumed in the US and 66% of calories in US children. UPFs are formulated from ingredients with no or infrequent culinary use, contain additives, and have a long shelf-life, spending long periods in contact with packaging materials, allowing for the absorption of compounds from those materials. The full implications of this dietary shift to UPFs on human health and disease outcomes are difficult, if not impossible, to quantify. However, UPF consumption is linked with various forms of cancer, increased cardiovascular disease, and increased all-cause mortality. Understanding food choice is, therefore, a critical problem in health research. Although many factors influence food choice, here we focus on the properties of the foods themselves. UPFs are generally treated as food, not as the highly refined, industrialized substances that they are, whose properties and components must be studied. Here, we examine one property of UPFs, that they deliver useable calories rapidly as a potential factor driving UPF overconsumption. First, we explore evidence that UPFs deliver calories more rapidly. Next, we examine the role of the gut-brain axis and its interplay with canonical reward systems, and last, we describe how speed affects both basic learning processes and drugs of abuse.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsFeeding BehaviorChildDietEnergy IntakeFood HandlingHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID35963586
PMCPMC9749763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.